Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp012v23vt376
Title: A Comparison of Interest Arbitrator Decision -Making in Experimental and Field Settings
Authors: Olson, Craig A.
Dell'Omo, Gregory
Keywords: interest arbitration
arbitrator decision-making
experimental economics
public sector bargaining
Issue Date: 1-May-1991
Citation: Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 45, No. 4, July, 1992
Series/Report no.: Working Papers (Princeton University. Industrial Relations Section) ; 284
Abstract: Recent studies have investigated arbitrator decision rules in both experimental and field settings. The external validity of experimental studies is evaluated by comparing the decisions made in an experiment with those made in actual cases for a common group of arbitrators. The results show the decision models used in the two settings are very similar when the decision problem in the two settings is carefully controlled to be the same.
URI: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp012v23vt376
Related resource: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0019-7939%28199207%2945%3A4%3C711%3AACOIAD%3E2.0.CO%3B2-H
Appears in Collections:IRS Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
284.pdf1.94 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.